Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Verifiable Request Data Model #179

Closed
decentralgabe opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

[PROPOSED WORK ITEM] Verifiable Request Data Model #179

decentralgabe opened this issue Jan 27, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees

Comments

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Member

New Work Item Proposal

See W3C-CCG New Work Item Process

Include Link to Abstract or Draft

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/16pcCj1VtJ0r2OcLM1GznpDreWSgedeBAB8lZtLlkIYM/edit?usp=sharing

List Owners

Identify 1 lead (person responsible for advancing the work item) and at least 1 other owner. Ideally, include their github usernames

Lead: @glcohen
Other owner: <your-name-here!>

@decentralgabe decentralgabe added the proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group label Jan 27, 2021
@dlongley
Copy link
Contributor

We do have a work item around verifiable requests here: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/vp-request-spec/

Perhaps the efforts could be joined?

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Member Author

@dlongley thanks. I'm open to joining efforts with that work item if you, Mike Varley, and @dmitrizagidulin agree it's a good fit.

@wyc
Copy link
Contributor

wyc commented Jan 27, 2021

Looping in @clehner who may be interested in participation.

@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

I'd like to get in on this. Github username is @kimdhamilton

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Member Author

It doesn't look like I'll have the time I wish I had to see this through. @kimdhamilton @dlongley I'd love to hand over the reigns to one of you and help from the sidelines

@kimdhamilton
Copy link
Contributor

I don't have the bandwidth to be the primary driver of it, at least not until this becomes a more pressing issue for me. Unless we have a "champion", we may need to put this on hold (which from a chair perspective means closing this issue, which one can reopen when it becomes more actionable)

@vsnt vsnt added the action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting label Feb 4, 2021
@vsnt
Copy link
Contributor

vsnt commented Feb 11, 2021

There is currently no owner for this work item. This was brought up at 2/10/2021 meeting, there were no volunteers. The Chairs will give 14 days to find 2 owners, and if there are no owners by then, will close this item. It can be re-opened later when there is more interest.

Close item on 2/25/2021 if unable to have 2 owners by 2/24/2021.

@vsnt vsnt removed the action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting label Feb 11, 2021
@vsnt vsnt added the action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting label Feb 24, 2021
@vsnt
Copy link
Contributor

vsnt commented Feb 24, 2021

No owners volunteered, closing item.

@vsnt vsnt closed this as completed Feb 24, 2021
@vsnt vsnt removed action: review next Items for discuss at next CCG meeting proposed work items Abstracts for potential work for approval by the community group labels Feb 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants