New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Methane conductivity #631
Comments
Can you provide references please? On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:07 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:
|
And it needs to cover the whole surface, liquid/vapor/critical On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Ian Bell ian.h.bell@gmail.com wrote:
|
Cook: Will look for more in-depth tables. |
Again, it needs to cover the full surface, it seems about the only model On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:48 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Yes, that is the only complete model I know of. Can find bits and pieces around, but nothing as complete. |
Which actually doesn't seem as horrible as I remember. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ian Bell ian.h.bell@gmail.com wrote:
|
It is a good reference, I have used it in the past, though like you said, very old. |
Seems like there might be a bug in Friend paper?
Found the other reference I have used, might be able to compare to Friend. |
Related to #547 - Viscosity of methane is functional, but missing conductivity. Some common correlations that I am aware of include Kumakawa 1986, Chin 1995, and Cook 1984.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: