Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Methane conductivity #631

Closed
jl230 opened this issue Apr 28, 2015 · 9 comments
Closed

Methane conductivity #631

jl230 opened this issue Apr 28, 2015 · 9 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jl230
Copy link

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

Related to #547 - Viscosity of methane is functional, but missing conductivity. Some common correlations that I am aware of include Kumakawa 1986, Chin 1995, and Cook 1984.

@ibell
Copy link
Contributor

ibell commented Apr 28, 2015

Can you provide references please?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:07 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:

Related to #547 #547 -
Viscosity of methane is functional, but missing conductivity. Some common
correlations that I am aware of include Kumakawa 1986, Chin 1995, and Cook
1984.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#631.

@ibell
Copy link
Contributor

ibell commented Apr 28, 2015

And it needs to cover the whole surface, liquid/vapor/critical

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Ian Bell ian.h.bell@gmail.com wrote:

Can you provide references please?

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:07 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:

Related to #547 #547 -
Viscosity of methane is functional, but missing conductivity. Some common
correlations that I am aware of include Kumakawa 1986, Chin 1995, and Cook
1984.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#631.

@jl230
Copy link
Author

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

Cook:
https://ia600505.us.archive.org/2/items/nasa_techdoc_19850004010/19850004010.pdf

Will look for more in-depth tables.

@jl230
Copy link
Author

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

@ibell
Copy link
Contributor

ibell commented Apr 28, 2015

Again, it needs to cover the full surface, it seems about the only model
available is the one in REFPROP, which is ancient:
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd362.pdf

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:48 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:

Another:
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd397.pdf


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#631 (comment).

@jl230
Copy link
Author

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

Yes, that is the only complete model I know of. Can find bits and pieces around, but nothing as complete.

@ibell
Copy link
Contributor

ibell commented Apr 28, 2015

Which actually doesn't seem as horrible as I remember.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ian Bell ian.h.bell@gmail.com wrote:

Again, it needs to cover the full surface, it seems about the only model
available is the one in REFPROP, which is ancient:
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd362.pdf

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:48 PM, jl230 notifications@github.com wrote:

Another:
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd397.pdf


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#631 (comment).

@jl230
Copy link
Author

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

It is a good reference, I have used it in the past, though like you said, very old.

ibell added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2015
Seems like there might be a bug in Friend paper?
@jl230
Copy link
Author

jl230 commented Apr 28, 2015

Found the other reference I have used, might be able to compare to Friend.
http://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd97.pdf

@ibell ibell closed this as completed in b51465b Apr 29, 2015
@ibell ibell added this to the v5.1.1 milestone Apr 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants