From 2201bb4bb68c7c3baa58869c245b8b4a3051791e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: erilong <erilong@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:13:00 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] shouldn't batchId be a number when binding SQL parameters?

---
 .../jumpmind/symmetric/service/impl/OutgoingBatchService.java   | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/symmetric/src/main/java/org/jumpmind/symmetric/service/impl/OutgoingBatchService.java b/symmetric/src/main/java/org/jumpmind/symmetric/service/impl/OutgoingBatchService.java
index 8d85a8a142..5f606cceef 100644
--- a/symmetric/src/main/java/org/jumpmind/symmetric/service/impl/OutgoingBatchService.java
+++ b/symmetric/src/main/java/org/jumpmind/symmetric/service/impl/OutgoingBatchService.java
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ public void markOutgoingBatchSent(OutgoingBatch batch) {
     }
 
     public void setBatchStatus(String batchId, Status status) {
-        jdbcTemplate.update(changeBatchStatusSql, new Object[] { status.name(), batchId });
+        jdbcTemplate.update(changeBatchStatusSql, new Object[] { status.name(), new Long(batchId) });
 
         if (status == Status.SE) {
             historyService.sent(new Integer(batchId));