Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Convert parcel ports into a plugin system #680

Closed
hkaiser opened this issue Jan 27, 2013 · 2 comments
Closed

Convert parcel ports into a plugin system #680

hkaiser opened this issue Jan 27, 2013 · 2 comments
Assignees
@hkaiser
Labels
category: parcel transport difficulty: easy Good issues for starting out with HPX development type: enhancement
Milestone
0.9.10

Comments

@hkaiser
Copy link
Member

hkaiser commented Jan 27, 2013

We should allow for third party people to supply there own parcel port implementation at runtime. The easiest would be to load parcel ports from separate shared libraries and accessing them using a virtual function interface.
@ghost ghost assigned hkaiser Jan 27, 2013
@sithhell sithhell mentioned this issue Nov 21, 2013
Open
7 tasks
@hkaiser hkaiser modified the milestones: 0.9.9, 0.9.8 Mar 15, 2014
@hkaiser hkaiser modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 0.9.9 Sep 13, 2014
@hkaiser
Copy link
Member Author

hkaiser commented Oct 13, 2014

A recent discussion on IRC with @biddisco added another facet to this: licensing. Having a plugin system for the parcel ports allows to integrate parcel ports which have licenses incompatible with HPX.

@sithhell sithhell mentioned this issue Jan 22, 2015
Merged
@sithhell
Copy link
Member

This has been done with merging #1361.

@hkaiser hkaiser modified the milestones: 0.9.10, 1.0.0 Feb 27, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@hkaiser hkaiser

Labels
category: parcel transport difficulty: easy Good issues for starting out with HPX development type: enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.9.10
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@sithhell @hkaiser