Allow multiple signal names

[niieani]

Additional signal names must be passed in as additional parameters in the binding behaviour, like: binding & signal:'first':'second':'third'.

Fixes #170.
Note: Individual Contributor License Agreement signed.

[EisenbergEffect]

CLA is confirmed. I can merge pending approval from @jdanyow

[niieani]

@EisenbergEffect Still need to add the test and conform to @jdanyow's specs. I'll do that sometime this week.

[EisenbergEffect]

@niieani Had any chance to work on the specs?

[niieani]

Hey @EisenbergEffect, Happy New Year to you and the Aurelia team!
I've not had the chance to do that yet, I've been really busy with my project, so for now I've just implemented this locally.
But I'll try to do this properly before the end of January.

[EisenbergEffect]

If you want to work on this, you will need to rebase on master.

[niieani]

Yes, I know.
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 at 15:38, Rob Eisenberg notifications@github.com wrote:

If you want to work on this, you will need to rebase on master.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#172 (comment)
.

[jdanyow]

@niieani let me know if you want a hand with this- we'd much rather merge your PR though!

[EisenbergEffect]

@niieani Ping...

[niieani]

@jdanyow For review.

[EisenbergEffect]

@jdanyow Can you review this now?
@niieani Would you mind rebasing this on master?

[niieani]

@EisenbergEffect that's odd, I had already rebased it into a single commit, did you force-push rewritten history on this repo? Anyway, I can do it again, just a bit of a pain this wasn't merged before that happened.

[EisenbergEffect]

I don't think we did anything like that. If you can do it one more time, I'll get it in.

[dkent600]

So this was never done? I'd love to have this kind of functionality at this moment.