<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<commit>
  <added type="array"/>
  <modified type="array">
    <modified>
      <diff>@@ -10,4 +10,80 @@ Separate Rails app.:
 
 * proxies calls to the CMS for HTML fragment, which is placed on the page. Application authentication occurs.
 * proxies calls to the CMS for Folder and its contents, which it decides how to display (think 'send to friend' workflow).
-* folds the administration system of the remote Rails app. into its own backend. (user integration or SSO)
\ No newline at end of file
+* folds the administration system of the remote Rails app. into its own backend. (user integration or SSO)
+
+
+
+Just hacking some ideas for a CMS.
+
+Notes
+
+
+Premise:
+
+Know what problems not to solve when writing a CMS, in their absence find easier ones. A dumb CMS.
+
+Separation of Concerns
+----------------------
+Logical division of applications (though could share same DB, probably use Rack middleware).
+
+Front application - CMS.
+
+Other app.s where building logic outside of a CMS  but being able to call on the CMS easily is desirable.
+structured forms (e.g. STF) - reuse of CMS
+complex workflows
+
+
+Leverage of Functionality
+-------------------------
+Administration - admin. templates should be able to be reused in the hosting app..
+
+Restful behaviour will ensure integration. User accounts and privileges should be integrated somehow (not hard).
+
+CMS.
+Conceived as a service, rather than an inclusive complex system.
+
+Folder - FolderEntry (subclassable) - Page
+
+To add a new CMS type for folders, e.g. attachment, you AttachmentFolderEntry &lt; FolderEntry, and Attachment belongs_to AttachmentFolderEntry through a polymorphic association.
+
+All Folder entries can be ordered easily on their folder.
+
+
+Roles - guest, member, admin. (roles can be made)
+
+Each Folder has CRUD assignments to roles - so R for guest, member, admin, is accessible content for everyone. If it's D for admins, only admins can delete what is in that folder. These rules define all access across the application, at the front and the back cms admin area (e.g. if a content editor role is invented, and a content editor wants to edit a page in the CMS admin, only pages in folders with RU will be presented in the controller).
+
+
+Alpha version:
+
+Folder, page, users and roles, admin system integrated across.
+
+
+How do they integrate?
+----------------------
+Content:
+
+All content is restful and is served to other app.s is security is satisfied. The format of the request is either html or xml.
+
+For generic content inclusion a standard CMS fetcher account should be used. This should be separate to the admin account.
+
+
+Users:
+Not sure yet. Users in the front application will have their own models and security rules.
+
+
+Paging?
+
+
+Further ideas
+-------------
+It would be great to have a generator which the front app. could call to produce admin. UIs.
+
+There's no reason why a CMS instance couldn't service a number of sites, each with a different folder hierarchy.
+
+
+
+
+
+Sancho CMS is named after Don Quixote's sidekick - Sancho Panza http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sancho_Panza .</diff>
      <filename>README</filename>
    </modified>
  </modified>
  <removed type="array"/>
  <parents type="array">
    <parent>
      <id>dd4c3aef723fca2a6efeb455686bfaa4f96bef4c</id>
    </parent>
  </parents>
  <author>
    <name>Nicholas Faiz</name>
    <email>nicholas.faiz@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <url>http://github.com/biv/cms_foo/commit/897a0fd2da3f49128464e1395b1627713c46dae7</url>
  <id>897a0fd2da3f49128464e1395b1627713c46dae7</id>
  <committed-date>2009-10-14T17:20:38-07:00</committed-date>
  <authored-date>2009-10-14T17:20:38-07:00</authored-date>
  <message>older readme included</message>
  <tree>f3c8bc77d7787307eb4fa53ff5dbdcc9cb0e6913</tree>
  <committer>
    <name>Nicholas Faiz</name>
    <email>nicholas.faiz@gmail.com</email>
  </committer>
</commit>
