public
Description: RR (Double Ruby) is a test double framework that features a rich selection of double techniques and a terse syntax.
Homepage: http://rubyforge.org/projects/double-ruby
Clone URL: git://github.com/btakita/rr.git
rr /
name age message
file .gitignore Wed Jun 18 01:11:14 -0700 2008 Ignoring intellij idea files. [btakita]
file CHANGES Wed Jun 18 23:29:12 -0700 2008 Version 0.4.9 [btakita]
file README.rdoc Wed Jun 18 23:06:41 -0700 2008 Adding matchers documentation. [btakita]
file Rakefile Wed Jun 18 23:29:42 -0700 2008 Version 0.4.9 [btakita]
file introducting_rr.txt Wed Jun 18 22:53:32 -0700 2008 Replacing proc invocations to lambda invocations. [btakita]
directory lib/ Wed Jun 18 22:57:53 -0700 2008 Reformatting. [btakita]
directory spec/ Wed Jun 18 22:55:08 -0700 2008 Replacing procs with lambdas. [btakita]
README.rdoc

RR

RR (Double Ruby) is a test double framework that features a rich selection of double techniques and a terse syntax.

What is a Test Double?

A Test Double is a generalization of something that replaces a real object to make it easier to test another object. Its like a stunt double for tests. The following are test doubles:

  • Mocks
  • Stubs
  • Fakes
  • Spies
  • Proxies

http://xunitpatterns.com/Test%20Double.html

Currently RR implements mocks, stubs, and proxies. In the future, RR will support spies.

Using RR

test/unit

  class Test::Unit::TestCase
    include RR::Adapters::TestUnit
  end

rspec

  Spec::Runners.configure do |config|
    config.mock_with :rr
    # or if that doesn't work due to a version incompatibility
    # config.mock_with RR::Adapters::Rspec
  end

Syntax between RR and other double/mock frameworks

Terse Syntax

One of the goals of RR is to make doubles more scannable. This is accomplished by removing words from a double declaration. Here is RR compared to other mock frameworks:

  flexmock(User).should_receive(:find).with('42').and_return(jane) # Flexmock
  User.should_receive(:find).with('42').and_return(jane) # Rspec
  User.expects(:find).with('42').returns {jane} # Mocha
  User.should_receive(:find).with('42') {jane} # Rspec using return value blocks
  mock(User).find('42') {jane} # RR

No "pure" mock object

RR is an opinionated framework. RR does not create a mock object for you, like other frameworks. Instead, RR utilizes a technique known as "double injection".

  my_object = MyClass.new
  mock(my_object).hello

Compare this with doing a mock in mocha:

  my_mocked_object = mock()
  my_mocked_object.expects(:hello)

If you wish to use objects for the sole purpose of being a mock, you can do so by creating an empty object.

  mock(my_mock_object = Object.new).hello

No should_receive or expects method

RR uses method_missing to set your method expectation. This means you do not need to use a method such as should_receive or expects.

  mock(my_object).hello # The hello method on my_object is mocked

Mocha:

  my_object.expects(:hello) # expects sets the hello method expectation

Rspec mocks:

  my_object.should_receive(:hello) # should_receive sets the hello method expectation

with method call is not necessary

Since RR uses method_missing, it also make using the with method unnecessary to set the argument expectations.

  mock(my_object).hello('bob', 'jane')

Mocha:

  my_object.expects(:hello).with('bob', 'jane')

Rspec mocks:

  my_object.should_receive(:hello).with('bob', 'jane')

using a block to set the return value

RR supports using a block to set the return value. RR also has the #returns method. Both of the examples are equivalent.

  mock(my_object).hello('bob', 'jane') {'Hello Bob and Jane'}
  mock(my_object).hello('bob', 'jane').returns('Hello Bob and Jane')

Mocha:

  my_object.expects(:hello).with('bob', 'jane').returns('Hello Bob and Jane')

Rspec mocks:

  my_object.should_receive(:hello).with('bob', 'jane').and_return('Hello Bob and Jane')
  my_object.should_receive(:hello).with('bob', 'jane') {'Hello Bob and Jane'} #rspec also supports blocks for the return value

Using RR

To create a double on an object, you can use the following methods:

  • mock
  • stub
  • proxy
  • instance_of

These methods are composable. mock and stub can be used by themselves and are mutually exclusive. proxy and instance_of must be chained with mock or stub. You can chain proxy and instance_of together.

mock

mock replaces the method on the object with an expectation and implementation. The expectations are a mock will be called with certain arguments a certain number of times (the default is once). You can also set the return value of the method invocation.

See http://xunitpatterns.com/Mock%20Object.html

The following example sets an expectation that the view will receive a method call to #render with the arguments {:partial => "user_info"} once. When the method is called "Information" is returned.

  view = controller.template
  mock(view).render(:partial => "user_info") {"Information"}

stub

stub replaces the method on the object with only an implementation. You can still use arguments to differentiate which stub gets invoked.

See http://xunitpatterns.com/Test%20Stub.html

The following example makes the User.find method return jane when passed ‘42’ and returns bob when passed ‘99’. If another id is passed to User.find, an exception is raised.

  jane = User.new
  bob = User.new
  stub(User).find('42') {jane}
  stub(User).find('99') {bob}
  stub(User).find do |id|
    raise "Unexpected id #{id.inspect} passed to me"
  end

mock.proxy

mock.proxy replaces the method on the object with an expectation, implementation, and also invokes the actual method. mock.proxy also intercepts the return value and passes it into the return value block.

The following example makes sets an expectation that view.render({:partial => "right_navigation"}) gets called once and return the actual content of the rendered partial template. A call to view.render({:partial => "user_info"}) will render the user_info partial template and send the content into the block and is represented by the html variable. An assertion is done on the html and "Different html" is returned.

  view = controller.template
  mock.proxy(view).render(:partial => "right_navigation")
  mock.proxy(view).render(:partial => "user_info") do |html|
    html.should include("John Doe")
    "Different html"
  end

You can also use mock.proxy to set expectations on the returned value. In the following example, a call to User.find(‘5’) does the normal ActiveRecord implementation and passes the actual value, represented by the variable bob, into the block. bob is then set with a mock.proxy for projects to return only the first 3 projects. bob is also mocked with valid? to return false.

  mock.proxy(User).find('5') do |bob|
    mock.proxy(bob).projects do |projects|
      projects[0..3]
    end
    mock(bob).valid? {false}
    bob
  end

stub.proxy

Intercept the return value of a method call. The following example verifies render partial will be called and renders the partial.

  view = controller.template
  stub.proxy(view).render(:partial => "user_info") do |html|
    html.should include("Joe Smith")
    html
  end

instance_of

Put double scenarios on instances of a Class.

  mock.instance_of(User).valid? {false}

Block Syntax

  script = MyScript.new
  mock(script) do |m|
    m.system("cd #{RAILS_ENV}") {true}
    m.system("rake foo:bar") {true}
    m.system("rake baz") {true}
  end

Argument Wildcard matchers

anything

  mock(object).foobar(1, anything)
  object.foobar(1, :my_symbol)

is_a

  mock(object).foobar(is_a(Time))
  object.foobar(Time.now)

numeric

  mock(object).foobar(numeric)
  object.foobar(99)

boolean

  mock(object).foobar(boolean)
  object.foobar(false)

duck_type

  mock(object).foobar(duck_type(:walk, :talk))
  arg = Object.new
  def arg.walk; 'waddle'; end
  def arg.talk; 'quack'; end
  object.foobar(arg)

Invocation Amount Wildcard Matchers

any_times

  mock(object).method_name(anything).times(any_times) {return_value}

Special Thanks To

With any development effort, there are countless people who have contributed to making it possible. We all are standing on the shoulders of giants.

  • Pivotal Labs for sponsoring RR development
  • Parker Thompson for pairing with me
  • Felix Morio for pairing with me
  • Jeff Whitmire for documentation suggestions
  • Nick Kallen for documentation suggestion & bug reports
  • David Chelimsky for encouragement to make the RR framework, for developing the Rspec mock framework, and syntax ideas
  • Gerard Meszaros for his excellent book "xUnit Test Patterns"
  • Dan North for syntax ideas
  • Jim Weirich for developing Flexmock, the first Terse ruby mock framework in Ruby
  • James Mead for developing Mocha
  • Aslak Hellesoy for Developing Rspec
  • Stephen Baker for Developing Rspec
  • Dave Astels for some BDD inspiration