From 100f838001b261fc52fd31e0b539885d619bccc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nathan Cutler Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 23:12:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: drop btrfs value judgment Probably not a good idea to claim that btrfs is the ideal filesystem choice for Ceph, especially since the same document (several paragraphs above this line) is reserved in its assessment of btrfs. Signed-off-by: Nathan Cutler --- doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst b/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst index e0d558a37a072..6225dd379ad51 100644 --- a/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst +++ b/doc/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations.rst @@ -92,8 +92,7 @@ capability means that ``btrfs`` can support snapshots that are writable. ``btrfs`` also incorporates multi-device management into the file system, which enables you to support heterogeneous disk storage infrastructure, data allocation policies. The community also aims to provide ``fsck``, -deduplication, and data encryption support in the future. This compelling -list of features makes ``btrfs`` the ideal choice for Ceph clusters. +deduplication, and data encryption support in the future. .. _copy-on-write: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copy-on-write .. _compared: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems