Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hammer: build/ops: improve ceph.in error message #10905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 23, 2016

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes: #11101
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai kchai@redhat.com
(cherry picked from commit e19e8f1)

@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the hammer milestone Aug 29, 2016
@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Aug 29, 2016
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tchaikov Do you know of any tests that rely on the old behavior?

@tchaikov
Copy link
Contributor

@smithfarm AFAIK, no. it's just a better error message. the old one is sort of misleading.

@smithfarm smithfarm changed the title ceph.in: improve the error message build/ops: improve ceph.in error message Oct 23, 2016
@smithfarm smithfarm changed the title build/ops: improve ceph.in error message hammer: build/ops: improve ceph.in error message Oct 23, 2016
smithfarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2016
…essage

Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
smithfarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2016
…essage

Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
Fixes: ceph#11101
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kchai@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit e19e8f1)
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liewegas This backport passed a rados suite at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-7 with failures that I believe have been addressed (except for http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15139 which is caused by the build system no longer providing dumpling-era packages).

I have rebuilt the integration branch to include the two fixes and scheduled a new run at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-14

Do you think it's OK to merge provided the second run succeeds?

smithfarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2016
…essage

Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
smithfarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2016
…essage

Reviewed-by: Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.com>
@liewegas
Copy link
Member

👍

@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note this also passed an upgrade suite at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17151#note-18

@smithfarm smithfarm merged commit a7c8c51 into ceph:hammer Nov 23, 2016
@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-11101-hammer branch November 23, 2016 21:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants