Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

jewel: rgw: Unable to commit period zonegroup change #12315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 1, 2017
Merged

jewel: rgw: Unable to commit period zonegroup change #12315

merged 1 commit into from Feb 1, 2017

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Dec 5, 2016

Fixes: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17364
Signed-off-by: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0870b00)
@ghost ghost self-assigned this Dec 5, 2016
@ghost ghost added this to the jewel milestone Dec 5, 2016
@ghost ghost added bug-fix rgw labels Dec 5, 2016
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2016
…oup change

Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost ghost changed the base branch from jewel-next to jewel December 21, 2016 23:25
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Dec 21, 2016

check this please

@smithfarm smithfarm merged commit ce309b8 into ceph:jewel Feb 1, 2017
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

(11:46:45 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: thanks. For jewel integration rgw, then, what it comes down to is verifying that these 6 valgrind failures are all libtcmalloc-related: http://pulpito.front.sepia.ceph.com/smithfarm-2017-01-31_12:35:14-rgw-wip-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/
(11:46:58 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: I will do that now
(11:47:05 AM) owasserm: smithfarm, thanks
(11:47:33 AM) smithfarm: owasserm: and assuming they are tcmalloc related, you said I can directly merge all the rgw PRs? Or do you want me to ask you for review in the PRs first?
(11:47:53 AM) owasserm: smithfarm, yes you can merge them
(11:48:19 AM) smithfarm: ok, will merge and do at least one or two more rgw runs before passing 10.2.6 to QE

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants