Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rgw: Swift API: response for PUT on /container does not contain the mandatory Content-Length header when FCGI is used #5170

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Jul 25, 2015

Conversation

smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor

Backport: hammer
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit f98fd4d)
Fixes: ceph#10971
Backport: hammer
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5a64fb5)
Fixes: ceph#11036
Backport: hammer
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit 10c1f1a)
Backport: hammer
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit d260a93)
Backport: hammer
Signed-off-by: Radoslaw Zarzynski <rzarzynski@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit 29073d8)
@smithfarm smithfarm added this to the firefly milestone Jul 8, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm self-assigned this Jul 8, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 8, 2015

DNM because the bot did not pass yet.
@smithfarm could you please rebase & repush to trigger the bot ?

@ghost ghost changed the title RGW Swift API: response for PUT on /container does not contain the mandatory Content-Length header when FCGI is used rgw: Swift API: response for PUT on /container does not contain the mandatory Content-Length header when FCGI is used Jul 21, 2015
@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dachary This has passed first round of integration testing as detailed in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11644

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 24, 2015

@smithfarm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yehudasa This commit has passed integration tests (see the previous comment by @dachary) -- is it OK to merge? I'm asking you because you merged the master commit that this is a backport of: #3863

@yehudasa
Copy link
Member

@smithfarm yes

smithfarm added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2015
rgw: Swift API: response for PUT on /container does not contain the mandatory Content-Length header when FCGI is used

Reviewed-by: Yahuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
@smithfarm smithfarm merged commit f11df3c into ceph:firefly Jul 25, 2015
@smithfarm smithfarm deleted the wip-12039-firefly branch July 25, 2015 11:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants