Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10.3.X] updated utm to tag 0.7.1 #4338

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Sep 17, 2018
Merged

Conversation

smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

as requested here #4334

as requested here #4334
@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 17, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30446/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @smuzaffar (Malik Shahzad Muzaffar) for branch IB/CMSSW_10_3_X/gcc700.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@smuzaffar smuzaffar changed the title updated utm to tag 0.7.1 [10.3.X] updated utm to tag 0.7.1 Sep 17, 2018
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 69415ac

  • Build:

I found an error when building:

+ export BOOST_BASE=/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/slc6_amd64_gcc700/external/boost/1.63.0-gnimlf
+ BOOST_BASE=/build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/slc6_amd64_gcc700/external/boost/1.63.0-gnimlf
+ make -j 8 -f Makefile.standalone all
make: Makefile.standalone: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target 'Makefile.standalone'.  Stop.
error: Bad exit status from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.LoyETX (%build)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /build/cmsbld/jenkins/workspace/ib-any-integration/testBuildDir/tmp/rpm-tmp.LoyETX (%build)



You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4338/30446/summary.html

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 17, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/30454/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #4338 was updated.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4338/30454/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 32
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3146746
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3146546
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 197
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 31 files compared)
  • Checked 133 log files, 14 edm output root files, 32 DQM output files

@rekovic
Copy link

rekovic commented Sep 17, 2018

thanks @smuzaffar
Is this external going to be part of tonight's 10_3_X IB ? It would be great if it could.

Asking because of two HeavyIon PR I want to make. The second of the two PRs depends on the first and on this external UTM at the same time. So having the UTM in the IB would help. Thanks.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor Author

+externals

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_10_3_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

smuzaffar added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2018
@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the smuzaffar-patch-4 branch September 19, 2018 10:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants