Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[10_2_X] Update data-RecoBTag-Combined.spec #4550

Merged

Conversation

mrodozov
Copy link
Contributor

@mrodozov mrodozov commented Dec 4, 2018

Backport of #4540

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for branch IB/CMSSW_10_2_X/gcc700.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @gudrutis, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@mrodozov mrodozov changed the title Update data-RecoBTag-Combined.spec [10_2_X] Update data-RecoBTag-Combined.spec Dec 4, 2018
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 4, 2018

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31978/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4550/31978/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 31
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3007299
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 4
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3007105
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 190
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 30 files compared)
  • Checked 129 log files, 14 edm output root files, 31 DQM output files

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 4, 2018

Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons

this confirms that this external can be merged by itself before the cms-sw/cmssw#25370 is merged.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Using cmssw from cms-sw/cmssw#25370
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/31994/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Using cmssw from cms-sw/cmssw#25370
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32010/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 5, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

this resolves #4537

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 6, 2018

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_10_2_X/gcc700 IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar, @fabiocos (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 6, 2018

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
Using cmssw from cms-sw/cmssw#25370
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/32046/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 7, 2018

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 7, 2018

Comparison job queued.

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

+externals

@smuzaffar smuzaffar merged commit f544720 into IB/CMSSW_10_2_X/gcc700 Dec 13, 2018
@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@andrzejnovak @slava77 @perrotta this external update is needed by cms-sw/cmssw#25370 , that is not yet ready to be merged. As 10_2_9 should start today, is this integration causing issues if not matched to its CMSSW counterpart? I see in https://github.com/cms-data/RecoBTag-Combined/pull/19/files that some files are removed and a few slightly modified, but this might change the behaviour, am I correct?

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 13, 2018

@fabiocos
tests completed in #4550 (comment)
show that this external can be integrated by itself.

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 sorry to be pedantic, is this test supposed to catch the changes induced by these data files? You answer would imply it is, they should appear in miniAOD output, am I correct? In such a case likely workflow 136.85 in the matrix should catch that? Where are these changes supposed to show an effect otherwise?

@fabiocos
Copy link
Contributor

ok, you comment

"jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show changes only in slimmedJetsAK8 jet tags in an expected way: new tags are added and the existing ones are unchanged"...

@smuzaffar smuzaffar deleted the backport-data-RecoBTag-Combined-102Xgcc7 branch December 13, 2018 13:58
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Dec 13, 2018

ok, you comment

"jenkins tests pass and comparisons with the baseline show changes only in slimmedJetsAK8 jet tags in an expected way: new tags are added and the existing ones are unchanged"...

Sorry, I'm lost.
I was responding to

@andrzejnovak @slava77 @perrotta this external update is needed by cms-sw/cmssw#25370 , that is not yet ready to be merged. As 10_2_9 should start today, is this integration causing issues if not matched to its CMSSW counterpart?

which I read as "can we integrate this data PR without cms-sw/cmssw#25370?"
My response is that by itself this data PR can be integrated and will not introduce any differences.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants