roll back to PREvious CRAB client version.

[belforte]

@mrodozov this will allow users to run crab client on older CMSSW w/o the hack described in
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/cernCompAnnounce/1444/1/1/2/1/1.html
they will have to use crab from IB, but that's rather straightforward
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/CMSCrabClient#Using_CRABClient_from_nightly_CM

For crab-prod I will rather change the code to have both this fix and the fixes from current (alas broken) version.

Sorry for the extra work,

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @belforte (Stefano Belforte) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_2_X/master.

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov, @tulamor can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
cms-bot commands are listed here

[smuzaffar]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

• CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-11-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc820: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-run-pr-tests/8717/console Started: 2020/08/12 02:01

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 09b086a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8c67ad/8717/summary.html
CMSSW: CMSSW_11_2_X_2020-08-11-1100
SCRAM_ARCH: slc7_amd64_gcc820

[cmsbuild]

Comparison job queued.

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8c67ad/8717/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 2 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 35
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2612401
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2612347
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.004 KiB( 34 files compared)
• DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 10224.0 ): 0.004 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
• Checked 149 log files, 22 edm output root files, 35 DQM output files

[mrodozov]

@belforte I merge this one and close the previous, correct ?

[belforte]

HI @smuzaffar @mrodozov I am puzzled that this PR does not seem to have made it to latest IB, differnetly from those for crab-prod and crab-dev (which were merged later btw).
When looking in CVMFS files have been updated

-rw-r--r--. 1 cvmfs cvmfs 13 Aug 13 04:04 /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-dev.latest
-rw-r--r--. 1 cvmfs cvmfs 13 Aug 13 04:04 /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-pre.latest
-rw-r--r--. 1 cvmfs cvmfs 13 Aug 13 04:04 /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-prod.latest

but crab-pre.latest still points to previous tag

belforte@lxplus780/TC3> cat /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-dev.latest 
v3.200812.00
belforte@lxplus780/TC3> cat /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-prod.latest 
v3.200812.00
belforte@lxplus780/TC3> cat /cvmfs/cms-ib.cern.ch/week1/share/cms/crab/1.0/etc/crab-pre.latest 
v3.200719.00
belforte@lxplus780/TC3> 

while it should be v3.200531.00
will this simply be updated tomorrow ? Or did something go wrong and is action needed ?

thanks

[smuzaffar]

@belforte , as the reverted version(200531) is smaller than the previous version (200719) so it will not become the default version for pre. You need to provide a new tag which should be greater than 200719 in otder to make it default for pre.

[belforte]

Gotcha. ThanksSent from. Stefano's phoneOn Aug 13, 2020 20:41, Malik Shahzad Muzaffar <notifications@github.com> wrote: @belforte , as the reverted version(200531) is smaller than the previous version (200719) so it will not become the default version for pre. You need to provide a new tag which should be greater than 200719 in otder to make it default for pre. —You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.