New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Try Madgraph 2.7.3 for py3 compatibility #6752
Try Madgraph 2.7.3 for py3 compatibility #6752
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @mrodozov (Mircho Rodozov) for branch IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @mrodozov can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f343c5/13677/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test workflow 511.0 for CMSSW_11_3_PY3_X |
-1 Failed Tests: Build BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Checking EDM Class Version for src/DataFormats/FWLite/src/classes_def.xml in libDataFormatsFWLite.so @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libDataFormatsBeamSpot.so >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libDataFormatsAlignment.so error: class 'CLHEP::Hep3Vector' has a different checksum for ClassVersion 10. Increment ClassVersion to 11 and assign it to checksum 3438801427 @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version >> Checking EDM Class Transients in libDataFormatsCTPPSDigi.so Suggestion: You can run 'scram build updateclassversion' to generate src/DataFormats/CLHEP/src/classes_def.xml.generated with updated ClassVersion gmake: *** [tmp/slc7_amd64_gcc900/edm_checks/libDataFormatsCLHEP.so] Error 1 @@@@ ----> OK EDM Class Version |
please test workflow 511.0 |
please test workflow 511.0 for CMSSW_11_3_PY3_X |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f343c5/13687/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f343c5/13686/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@smuzaffar I think generators might have other concerns than integration+working lets ask them |
assign generators |
Pull request #6752 was updated. |
please test |
please test workflow 511.0 for CMSSW_11_3_PY3_X |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
RelVals-INPUT
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f343c5/13698/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
please test workflow 511.0 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f343c5/13711/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+externals |
Thank you for doing this! |
+generators |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_11_3_X/master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @silviodonato, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
this is building, want to check if it integrates and runs
@Dominic-Stafford I don't know whats the difference between 273 and 292 but I'll assume they are similar, so I got the latest version
Resolves: #5324