New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ROCm 5.0.2 for x86_64 #7795
Add ROCm 5.0.2 for x86_64 #7795
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard (Andrea Bocci) for branch IB/CMSSW_12_4_X/master. @cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @aandvalenzuela, @iarspider can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
This is currently a work in progress, in order to test the behaviour of the spec file on different architectures. |
@cmsbuild, please test |
@cmsbuild, please test for alma8_amd64_gcc10 |
@cmsbuild, please test for slc7_aarch64_gcc11 |
@cmsbuild, please test for slc7_ppc64le_gcc11 |
@cmsbuild, please test for cs8_amd64_gcc10 |
@cmsbuild, please test for el8_amd64_gcc10 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1aad47/23993/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test for el9_amd64_gcc11 |
@fwyzard , it adds up 17GB ( https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1aad47/23993/external-tools.html ) to cmssw distribution ... how about we make it an optional cmssw dependency e.g.
|
That's unexpected - the new package should contain only a symlink, the full installation is under |
ah ok, it could be the size check script is following symlinks. I will check |
Also, it looks like at least for some architectures it didn't work as intended :-(
I have no idea why there is a |
By the way, the plan would be
There are also some practical issues with the installation itself: it is based on RPMs and does rely on the installation scripts, so I'm playing some |
|
Thanks, I'll make the change and re-run the tests. |
ad930c2
to
b684471
Compare
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1aad47/24096/summary.html Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
For more information, see the documentation at: - ROCm 5.0: https://docs.amd.com/category/ROCm_v5.0 - ROCm 5.0.2: https://docs.amd.com/category/ROCm_v5.0.2
e7ba230
to
1de8c41
Compare
@cmsbuild, please test |
Pull request #7795 was updated. |
@cmsbuild, please test for el8_aarch64_gcc10 |
@cmsbuild, please test for el8_amd64_gcc10 |
@cmsbuild, please test for el8_ppc64le_gcc10 |
@cmsbuild, please test for el9_amd64_gcc11 |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1aad47/24103/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1aad47/24104/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: |
+externals |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IB/CMSSW_12_4_X/master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
+1 Comparison Summary@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Summary:
|
This PR aims to add AMD ROCm 5.x as an external for CMSSW, without including it in the CMSSW distribution.
Instead, the ROCm tools and libraries are used over CVMFS from the Patatrack repository, similarly to what is done for the Intel tools.
For more information, see the documentation at: