fixes for running in unscheduled mode, rebase to 76X

[webermat]

this PR is the rebased version of PR #9939 thus should superseed it.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @webermat for CMSSW_7_6_X.

fixes for running in unscheduled mode, rebase to 76X

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/StandardSequences
DQMOffline/JetMET
Validation/RecoMET

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @franzoni, @deguio, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @makortel, @rappoccio, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @TaiSakuma, @rovere, @VinInn, @Martin-Grunewald, @ahinzmann, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @cerati, @mariadalfonso, @dgulhan, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[webermat]

tested locally that both process 1302 and 11325 finish successfully

[deguio]

please test

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[deguio]

thanks @webermat
can you submit the same to 75 as well?
thanks,
F.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/8883/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/8875/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/8883/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6573/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6570/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6573/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6570/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/152/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6579/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/152/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6579/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/8898/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6587/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6590/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6587/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/8898/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6590/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6593/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6593/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6589/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/757/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6589/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/757/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6047510
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6604/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10289/6604/summary.html

[makortel]

Hi,

(not sure if this is a proper place to ask, but I'll start here nevertheless)

Was the addition of EventContentAnalyzer to METValidationMiniAOD sequence (with module label dump) intentional? Running step3 of e.g. workflow 25202 in a recent IB is now very verbose unless one removes it by hand.

Cheers,
Matti

[davidlange6]

seems we like printouts in cms…
sorry we missed that during integration

On Aug 8, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Matti Kortelainen notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi,

(not sure if this is a proper place to ask, but I'll start here nevertheless)

Was the addition of EventContentAnalyzer to METValidationMiniAOD sequence (with module label dump) intentional? Running step3 of e.g. workflow 25202 in a recent IB is now very verbose unless one removes it by hand.

Cheers,
Matti

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[deguio]

thanks @davidlange6 for the fix.
F.