Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gem segment 76 #10485

Merged
merged 111 commits into from Aug 26, 2015
Merged

Gem segment 76 #10485

merged 111 commits into from Aug 26, 2015

Conversation

pietverwilligen
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request for making segments in ME0. This is one of the last PRs for porting Muon Upgrade code from SLHC to 76X. Last PR to be expected is a PR containing code to reconstruct ME0Muons starting from these ME0 segments.

@cvuosalo I have tried as much as possible to check for comments you made for the GEMCSC Segment PR #9083 and to comments made earlier to ME0Segment code in PR #8912.

@slava77 and @cvuosalo please let me know your comments.
greets
Piet

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_7_6_X milestone Jul 30, 2015
for (auto rh=rechits.begin(); rh!=rechits.end(); ++rh){
timeUncrt += pow((*rh)->tof()-averageTime,2);
}
if(rechits.size() != 0) timeUncrt=timeUncrt/(rechits.size());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this will be exactly 0 for rechits = 1; not sure it matters, but still worth to note

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

noted, but does not matter, because the segment is only made when there are 2 or more hits.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 19, 2015

@pietverwilligen please let me know your plans about #10485 (comment)

@pietverwilligen
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #10485 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 20, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Aug 20, 2015

+1

for #10485 e0ad8cd

  • code changes are OK, including follow up to the code review (some things could still be improved; the code is not running in the mainstream workflows yet)
  • jenkins tests pass (compilation, unit tests, and static analysis are among the relevant pieces); there are no changes to the standard workflows

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Aug 24, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2015
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 2423f1a into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_6_X Aug 26, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants