MET Filter update (port of #10604)

[schoef]

Please see #10604

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @schoef for CMSSW_7_5_X.

MET Filter update for mAOD reprocessing (port of #10604)

It involves the following packages:

CalibMuon/DTCalibration
CommonTools/RecoAlgos
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoMET/METFilters

@diguida, @cvuosalo, @cerminar, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vadler, @mmusich can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @jdolen, @imarches, @makortel, @acaudron, @abbiendi, @mmarionncern, @jhgoh, @ahinzmann, @nhanvtran, @ferencek, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @TaiSakuma this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: c93b975
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10608/193930/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10608/193930/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
4.53 step 2
4.22 step 2
140.53 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

[slava77]

+1

for #10608 c93b975

• code changes are as expected
• same code as in 74X and in 76X version (74X was tested additionally with run2 prompt reco setup)
• jenkins tests passed and comparisons with the baseline show no relevant differences
  • jenkins comparisons there show diffs in logErrors which are expected to change due to changes in the running modules

[slava77]

@monttj, @mmusich @diguida
Please check, your signatures are needed
Thank you

[mmusich]

+1
clean up of ALCARECODtCalibHI and ALCARECODtCalib configurations.
The 76X equivalent #10604 is already signed

[slava77]

@monttj
please check if this PR is OK
Thanks

[monttj]

+1
same for AT

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1