Add impact parameter significance histograms to tracking DQM (74X)

[makortel]

Backport of #8410 and #9099:

Add following histograms for impact parameter significances

• dxy and dz wrt. both primary vertex and beam spot
• signed 2D and 3D impact parameters wrt. primary vertex as defined in IPTools

Add a new flag doSIPPlots to control if they're filled or not. By default it is set to False, and enabled when PCA histograms are.

Tested in 748patch1, expecting only the addition of the "SIP*" histograms.

@VinInn @rovere

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Add impact parameter significance histograms to tracking DQM (74X)

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitor
DQM/TrackingMonitorSource

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[VinInn]

@deguio , @davidlange6 it would be very useful to have this in next prod (patch) release

[deguio]

ciao @makortel
don't you want to have this in 75 as well?
F.

[deguio]

please test

[makortel]

@Degano The original PRs were in 75x :)

[makortel]

Sorry, that should have been @deguio (being too quick with the tab)

[deguio]

ups, you are right. it was before the 76x times.
thanks,
F.

[deguio]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 9229582
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-10660/7194/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1