Update two variables of electron MVA to match the training definition (76X)

[lgray]

Update BDT evaluation code to match the training definitions exactly.

Affects VID / MiniAOD.

[lgray]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for CMSSW_7_6_X.

Update two variables of electron MVA to match the training definition (76X)

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[cmsbuild]

-1
Tested at: 983f5ad
The relvals timed out after 2 hours.

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
5.1 step1

runTheMatrix-results/5.1_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS/step1_TTbar+TTbarFS+HARVESTFS.log

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11260/8099/summary.html

[slava77]

edm::service::InitRootHandlers::stacktraceFromThread() in a few workflows that I looked at .
I guess the CMSSW_7_6_X_2015-09-15-1100 is broken

[slava77]

+1

for #11260 983f5ad

• code changes look OK
• jenkins jobs failed due to issues in IB
• signed off based on observations in 75X for Update two variables of electron MVA to match the training definition (75X) #11261

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[smuzaffar]

#11270 should fix this
I am going to merge #11270 and start an IB as soon as 23h00 IB is done

[lgray]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 983f5ad
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11260/8125/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11260/8125/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_6_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1