Fix PU jet ID config used for MVAmet

[ahinzmann]

Fixes the problem in the PU jet ID config, to be able to run on the new MiniAOD samples, reported in this thread:
https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3413/1/1.html

[ahinzmann]

This PR is for an analysis release, such that analyzers can run MVAmet on the new MiniAODs.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ahinzmann for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Fix PU jet ID config used for MVAmet

It involves the following packages:

RecoMET/METPUSubtraction

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @mmarionncern, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@ahinzmann are there PRs for 75X and 76X? (there is no auto-forward porting from 74X)

[ahinzmann]

@slava77 thanks for the message. I was indeed hoping for auto-forward port, but I'll do the 75 and 76 PR now.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: cc499ec
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11428/8276/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11428/8276/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #11428 cc499ec

Adding a missing parameter for PU jet ID config, for use by analysts. There should be no change in RECO.

Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-09-22-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1