EGM ID Updates from recipes (74X)

[lgray]

Backport of #11738.

MiniAOD embedding is not updated to the latest version in this backport to keep MiniAOD in line with 7_4_14 reMiniAOD campaign.

Externals PR is here: cms-data/RecoEgamma-ElectronIdentification#6
Please wait until this is in an IB before testing.

@ikrav

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @lgray (Lindsey Gray) for CMSSW_7_4_X.

EGM ID Updates from recipes (74X)

It involves the following packages:

RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification
RecoEgamma/PhotonIdentification

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Sam-Harper this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[lgray]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/8887/console

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #11740 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 2ba0e1f
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11740/8887/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-11740/8887/summary.html

[slava77]

+1

for #11740 2ba0e1f

• changes are in line with the PR description: the MVAs are running , but are not saved in miniAOD
• jenkins tests pass and comparisons with baseline show no differences
• tested locally in CMSSW_7_4_X_2015-10-20-2300: no differences are confirmed looking at miniAOD product sizes (electronMVAValueMapProducer producer take up ~0.5ms/evt more time, which is OK; although dead products/destinations are not a particularly good thing)

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[lgray]

@davidlange6 ping... just to make sure.