PR for adding the cfi of HITrackClusterRemover.cc for ConfDB use in 75 (same as #12220)

[ginnocen]

Hello,

We would ask to PR the following modification in order to be able to use the HITrackClusterRemover
in ConfDB for HLT tracking. The PR consist of the corresponding cfi file and a small modification in the producer as a protection in case of null string in the oldClusterRemovalInfo.

Same as #12220 for 74.
Thanks, Cheers, Gian Michele

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ginnocen for CMSSW_7_5_X.

PR for adding the cfi of HITrackClusterRemover.cc for ConfDB use in 75 (same as #12220)

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalTracker/SubCollectionProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @forthommel, @yduhm, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @gbenelli, @rovere, @VinInn, @nickmccoll, @jlagram, @gpetruc, @cerati, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9407/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 6e34295
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12221/9407/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12221/9407/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #12221 6e34295

Adding Python cfi for HITrackClusterRemover.cc for ConfDB use. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #12220 and #12222 are the 74X and 76X versions of this PR, and they have already been approved by Reco.

The code change is satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-10-31-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1