Bug fix for compatible mode in UETableProducer. Don't overwrite pytho…

[mverwe]

…n files in make_db.sh.
Does not have impact on reconstruction. Bug fix for DB generation.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mverwe (Marta Verweij) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Bug fix for compatible mode in UETableProducer. Don't overwrite pytho

It involves the following packages:

RecoHI/HiJetAlgos

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@yslai, @jazzitup, @richard-cms, @yenjie, @kurtejung, @istaslis, @mandrenguyen, @dgulhan, @yetkinyilmaz this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' or '@cmsbuild, please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test
... jenkins is down though, unclear if this message will be queued or just missed

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/9415/console

[smuzaffar]

@slava77 , jenkins is up again but web access via cmssdt is not configured yet
Any, cms bot should see these messages and trigger the tests properly

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 581060b
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12227/9415/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-12227/9415/summary.html

[slava77]

@mverwe
please make a PR in 76X (80X will get it by auto-forward-port from 76X).

[mverwe]

@slava77
PR for 76X made: #12239

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #12227 581060b

Bug fix in Heavy Ion UETableProducer for DB generation. There should be no change in monitored quantities. #12239 is the 76X version of this PR.

The code change is satisfactory, though thread safety will need to be addressed in the 76X version. Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_7_5_X_2015-11-01-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_7_6_X is complete. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1