Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bring L1T emulation up to date with l1t-tsg-v4 tag #13768

Merged
merged 241 commits into from Apr 1, 2016

Conversation

mulhearn and others added 30 commits February 9, 2016 12:14
Conflicts:
	L1Trigger/L1TCalorimeter/data/Flat_Tau_iso_LUT_eff70.txt
	L1Trigger/L1TCalorimeter/data/Flat_Tau_iso_LUT_eff80.txt
	L1Trigger/L1TCalorimeter/data/Flat_Tau_iso_LUT_eff90.txt
* the phi angle converions follows hardware mroe closely
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #13768 was updated. @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @franzoni, @ggovi, @mmusich, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@mulhearn
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12123/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #13768 was updated. @cerminar, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @franzoni, @ggovi, @mmusich, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@mulhearn
Copy link
Contributor Author

That last commit covers (I believe) all requests except those we are requesting to punt on, tracked here cms-l1t-offline#220

@mulhearn
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2016

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

merging in for the 1100 IB - lets see how it goes.

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 6d75c5e into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Apr 1, 2016
@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Apr 4, 2016

@davidlange6 Could this be also back-ported to 80X?
Or would we have to resurrect #13767, which is a PR with a different branch.

@mulhearn, @Martin-Grunewald, this interests you.

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic
Well, I thought #13767 IS the equivalent backport PR for 80X to this 81XPR!
????

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic
Does #13767 miss the most recent commits of this PR?

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Apr 4, 2016

@Martin-Grunewald #13767 is missing the latest OMTF EMTF fixes, etc. @mulhearn can you comment?

@Martin-Grunewald
Copy link
Contributor

Well, then could we make a new PRs for those, for 80X and 81X?

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Apr 4, 2016

@Martin-Grunewald
By "latest OMTF EMTF fixes", I meant the latest commits of code clean-up listed in this 81x PR and already merged 3 days ago after @mulhearn cleaned 81x code. I imagine he will do the same clean-up for 80x and make a 80x PR. Let's wait for his comment.

@mulhearn
Copy link
Contributor Author

mulhearn commented Apr 5, 2016

PR for 80x was updated to bring in sync with this one. Testing now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet