Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Civanch/geant4.9.6ref10 physics #1401

Merged

Conversation

civanch
Copy link
Contributor

@civanch civanch commented Nov 11, 2013

No description provided.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Nov 11, 2013

This pull request include modifications needed for interface change in Geant4 10.0; it is not backward compatible.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Nov 11, 2013

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @civanch (Vladimir Ivantchenko) for CMSSW_7_0_GEANT10_X.

Civanch/geant4.9.6ref10 physics

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/Geometry
SimG4Core/SensitiveDetector
SimG4Core/Physics
SimG4Core/PhysicsLists
SimG4Core/Generators
SimG4CMS/FP420
Alignment/LaserAlignmentSimulation
SimG4CMS/HcalTestBeam
SimG4CMS/CherenkovAnalysis
SimG4Core/Application
SimG4CMS/Forward
SimG4CMS/Muon
SimG4CMS/EcalTestBeam
SimG4CMS/Calo
SimG4Core/MagneticField
SimG4CMS/Tracker
SimG4CMS/ShowerLibraryProducer

@demattia, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @rcastello can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor Author

civanch commented Nov 11, 2013

+1

@civanch civanch mentioned this pull request Nov 11, 2013
ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2013
@ktf ktf merged commit 34fff66 into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_GEANT10_X Nov 11, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants