More general form of valid hit in pixel function (81X)

[dildick]

Functions that check if there are valid hits in the second and third pixel (barrel/endcap) layer.

In response to #13744 (comment)

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @dildick (Sven Dildick) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/TrackingMonitor
DataFormats/TrackReco
ElectroWeakAnalysis/ZEE
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoBTag/TrackProbability
RecoEgamma/ElectronIdentification
RecoVertex/PrimaryVertexProducer

@cvuosalo, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rappoccio, @TaiSakuma, @threus, @mmarionncern, @imarches, @makortel, @acaudron, @lgray, @jdolen, @ferencek, @cerati, @Sam-Harper, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rafaellopesdesa, @rovere, @VinInn, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @dgulhan, @ahinzmann, @gpetruc, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12298/console

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: db43178
I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test runtestTqafTopEventSelection had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14027/12298/summary.html

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
db43178
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14027/12298/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14027/12298/git-merge-result

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14027/12298/summary.html

[dildick]

The unit test error was also seen here #13744 (comment). It is not related to this PR.

[slava77]

+1

for #14027 db43178

• the same code as earlier signed in 80X
  More general form of valid hit in pixel function #13744 (comment)
• jenkins tests pass (the unit test failing in IB is ignored) and comparisons show no differences

[deguio]

+1