relval matrix update, add 3 Higgs LHE basked fullsim workflows

[hengne]

relval matrix update, add 3 Higgs LHE basked fullsim workflows
Needed for near future HLT validation.
based on PR #14224 and PR #14117

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @hengne (Hengne Li) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator
Configuration/PyReleaseValidation

@covarell, @thuer, @fabozzi, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @govoni, @hengne, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[hengne]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/12620/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 01e1bf3
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14237/12620/summary.html

[hengne]

+1

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14237/12620/summary.html

The workflows 134.911 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

[govoni]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

@davidlt , @smuzaffar - what do we need add to CMSSW in order to run these workflows in the IBs?

[smuzaffar]

@davidlange6 , tar files are already on cvmfs, so there should not be any issue running these in IBs. We can even test these workflows in this PR testing by explicitly providing the extra workflows to run. Should I try running with workflows 1360,1361,1362, 1363 .... any other wfs to test?

[davidlt]

From our we don't need to do anything. This looks to be Generators stuff which they manage themselves on CVMFS.

[davidlange6]

ok- so we are now happy with using cvmfs (e.g., relying on it) in the IBs.

On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:31 PM, davidlt notifications@github.com wrote:

From our we don't need to do anything. This looks to be Generators stuff which they manage themselves on CVMFS.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[hengne]

@davidlange6 @davidlt Actually there are the extended generator workflows in the matrix, they all use LHE based generation which fetch gridpacks from cvmfs. If they are all in the IB tests since the beginning, it should be fine also for the 3 newly added workflows.

[davidlange6]

Ok, thought we had disabled most of the , but seems I'm confused.

[davidlt]

I think, majority of 5XX workflows are like that. That's why they are failing on POWER8 and ARMv8, because they get some tarball from CVMFS which contains x86_64 binaries.