Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bsunanda:Run2-hcx83 Update Geometry to handle minimum depth > 1 and max phi > 72 #14594

Merged
merged 4 commits into from May 25, 2016

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 20, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13109/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

Geometry/CaloTopology
Geometry/HcalCommonData

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda still needs a tweak... it knows minDepth=2 for ieta=17, but now it thinks maxDepth=4.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpedro88 Can you give me the matrix # which can reproduce the problem

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda It's a 2017dev workflow, so there's not really a good runTheMatrix command right now. Here's a script I've been using with the latest IBs:

#!/bin/bash

cmsDriver.py SinglePiE50HCAL_pythia8_cfi  --conditions auto:phase1_2017_design -n 10 --era Run2_2017 --geometry "Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017dev_cff,Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017devReco_cff" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUG -s GEN,SIM --datatier GEN-SIM --beamspot Realistic50ns13TeVCollision --fileout file:step1.root --customise SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/HCalCustoms.customise_Hcal2017 > step1_SinglePiE50_UP15+SinglePiE50_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log  2>&1

cmsDriver.py step2  --conditions auto:phase1_2017_design -s DIGI:pdigi_valid,L1,DIGI2RAW,HLT:@relval25ns --datatier GEN-SIM-DIGI-RAW-HLTDEBUG -n 10 --era Run2_2017 --geometry "Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017dev_cff,Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017devReco_cff" --eventcontent FEVTDEBUGHLT --filein file:step1.root  --fileout file:step2.root --customise SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/HCalCustoms.customise_Hcal2017 > step2_SinglePiE50_UP15+SinglePiE50_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log  2>&1

cmsDriver.py step3  --runUnscheduled  --conditions auto:phase1_2017_design -s RAW2DIGI,L1Reco,RECO,EI,PAT --datatier GEN-SIM-RECO,MINIAODSIM -n 10 --era Run2_2017 --geometry "Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017dev_cff,Configuration.Geometry.GeometryExtended2017devReco_cff" --eventcontent RECOSIM,MINIAODSIM --filein file:step2.root  --fileout file:step3.root --customise SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration/HCalCustoms.customise_Hcal2017 > step3_SinglePiE50_UP15+SinglePiE50_UP15+DIGIUP15+RECOUP15+HARVESTUP15.log  2>&1

The problem(s) with validRaw cause a segmentation violation in CaloTowersCreationAlgo::hadShwPosFromCells(DetId, DetId, float) in step3.

To see which cells cause the problem, I added a cout near the end of the preceding function, CaloTowersCreationAlgo::hadShwrPos(CaloTowerDetId towerId, float fracDepth):

+  std::cout << "CaloTowersCreationAlgo: front = " << frontCellId << ", back = " << backCellId << std::endl;
+
   point = hadShwPosFromCells(DetId(frontCellId), DetId(backCellId), fracDepth);

   return point;

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 22, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13124/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #14594 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@@ -144,7 +145,7 @@ HcalTopology::HcalTopology(HcalTopologyMode::Mode mode, int maxDepthHB, int maxD
firstHETripleDepthRing_((mode==HcalTopologyMode::H2 || mode==HcalTopologyMode::H2HE)?(24):(27)),
singlePhiBins_(72), doublePhiBins_(36),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bsunanda - why singlePhiBins_ initialisation is kept unchanged here, while it was changed in the other constructor? BTW, the variable is not modified anywhere. Is it needed as a variable or the IPHI_MAX constant can be used instead?

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 24, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13160/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #14594 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @cvuosalo, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented May 24, 2016

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77 can you sign again? This one is very important for HCAL 2017 development.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented May 24, 2016

+1

for #14594 1fbcfe7

  • changes since last reco approval do not affect reco code
  • jenkins tests still show no differences (as expected)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 4229fca into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X May 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants