Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow dynamic eta dependency of weight files #14723

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Jun 9, 2016

Conversation

jbrands
Copy link
Contributor

@jbrands jbrands commented Jun 1, 2016

This PR allows to include various different eta training files with different variables in RecoJets/JetProducers/python/PileupJetIDParams_cfi.py.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @jbrands for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoJets/JetProducers

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @jdolen, @ahinzmann, @rappoccio, @yslai, @nhanvtran, @schoef, @mariadalfonso this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

std::vector<std::string> tmvaSpectators_;
std::map<std::string,std::string> tmvaNames_;

Int_t version_;
Float_t impactParTkThreshod_;
bool cutBased_;
bool etaBinnedWeights_;
Int_t nEtaBins_;
std::vector<Double_t> jEtaMin_;
std::vector<Double_t> jEtaMax_;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we change everything in this file to C/C++ native types?
int, float, double

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Jun 1, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@jbrands please confirm that no changes are expected from this update. Otherwise, please provide some plots or slides describing the differences.
Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13312/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

@jbrands
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbrands commented Jun 1, 2016

I confirm that no changes are expected with this update. I did some checks to be sure that the output of the PU Jet Id has now changed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

Pull request #14723 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Jun 1, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 1, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13323/console

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Jun 3, 2016

@jbrands:
Should this PR change MVA output? Shown below is an example from Jenkins workflow 25202.0. Black is the baseline, and red is the PR. Note changes like this one appear in four workflows tested.

jetmva

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 6, 2016

Pull request #14723 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@jbrands
Copy link
Contributor Author

jbrands commented Jun 6, 2016

@cvuosalo Sorry for this typo, I have no idea how it got into the PR.
Hope this was the reason for the changed MVA output

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Jun 6, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2016

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 7, 2016

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

cvuosalo commented Jun 8, 2016

+1

For #14723 da7560c

Adding eta-specific MVA training files for PU jet ID. There should be no change in monitored quantities.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-06-06-2300 show no significant differences, as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2016

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit aef8a44 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Jun 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants