Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rpc and irpc digitization phase ii #14769

Merged

Conversation

bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor

@bapavlov bapavlov commented Jun 4, 2016

A new digi format to simulate the new type of RPCs ( iRPCs) and the new RPC electronics for 2023 upgrade. Also a digi model to simulate the iRPCs and the new electronics is included. The digi model allows to simulate the precise timing expected to be achieved with TDC readout (to be installed for 2023 upgrade).

Everything is working (both with CMSSW_8_1_0_pre5 and CMSSW_8_1_0_pre6), including also the reco step.

The code is essential for RPC upgrade studies.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 4, 2016

A new Pull Request was created by @bapavlov for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/RPCDigi
SLHCUpgradeSimulations/Configuration
SimMuon/RPCDigitizer

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @Martin-Grunewald, @jhgoh this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @Degano, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 9, 2016

@bapavlov , there are few comments to this PR (all are minor):
RPCDigi.h - line#16 can be removed (boost is not needed here), access methods better be inlined.
RPCDigi.cc - access methods should be moved to the header.
fixMissingUpgradeGTpayloads.py - commented lines may be removed.
muonRPCDigis_cfi.py - commented lines may be removed.
RPCDigitizer.cc - there is no needs to have logDebug commented: remove these lines or uncomment.
RPCSim.cc - lines#15-16 may be removed.
RPCSimModelTimomg.h - lines #34,35, 39-42, 56-92 may be removed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #14769 was updated. @cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 12, 2016

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 12, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13465/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14769/13465/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • 134.911_RunSinglePh2015D+RunSinglePh2015D+HLTDR2_25ns+RECODR2_25nsreHLT+HARVESTDR2

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #14769 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bapavlov should I restart tests?

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@bapavlov you have to be on this list to control the bot:
https://github.com/cms-sw/cms-bot/blob/master/categories.py#L1341

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@bapavlov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kpedro88 yes, please restart. I have put wrong muonRPCDigis_cfi.py file. I have updated it. The same tests are passing on lxplus with the new muonRPCDigis_cfi.py file.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 27, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/13705/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-14769/13705/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
5.1 step 2
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Jun 28, 2016

+1

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Jun 28, 2016

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@davidlange6 reminder to merge...

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

kpedro88 commented Jul 3, 2016

@davidlange6 why is this not merged yet?

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit b0e82b5 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Jul 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants