New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bsunanda:Phase2-hgx59 Add beam line for HGCal test beam studies #14891
Conversation
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X. It involves the following packages: Geometry/HGCalCommonData @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are list here #13028 |
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ | |||
#include "CLHEP/Units/GlobalPhysicalConstants.h" | |||
#include "CLHEP/Units/GlobalSystemOfUnits.h" | |||
|
|||
//#define DebugLog | |||
#define DebugLog |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsunanda - please, comment it out for release or use LogDebug
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bsunanda - please, comment it out.
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Pull request #14891 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
Pull request #14891 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
@cmsbuild Please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 |
@civanch Could you sign this please |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar |
+1 |
This seems to have caused a thread-safety problem found by the static analysis tool
@ianna can you comment on if this is really a problem? |
A quick look at some of the other sensitive detectors didn't turn up any cases where the |
std::map<G4String,int> matNames; | ||
while (dodet) { | ||
const DDLogicalPart & log = fv.logicalPart(); | ||
matName = log.material().name().name(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is the thread-unsafe operation.
Possibility of readout of the trigger scintillators