Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase1 Pixel Triplets Seeding by CA - LayerCache cleared after use #15862

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Sep 23, 2016

Conversation

felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor

The LayerCache should be cleared after use so that we don't get unexpected behavior in following events.

You can test triplets by customizing the process with: customiseForTripletsHLTPixelTracksByCellularAutomaton

@makortel @mtosi @VinInn @rovere

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @felicepantaleo (Felice Pantaleo) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoPixelVertexing/PixelTriplets
RecoTracker/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @mschrode, @gpetruc, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 15, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@felicepantaleo is there a customize similar to customiseForTripletsHLTPixelTracksByCellularAutomaton that could apply for reco ?

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 15, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15162/console

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77
I will make it and commit it.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #15862 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #15862 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77 you can now use: customiseForTripletsByCellularAutomaton
Of course it will not produce nice physics results, since it is replacing all the triplets but at least it will work as expected.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 15, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@felicepantaleo thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 15, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15166/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 15, 2016

@felicepantaleo should we call it a bugfix?

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@slava77 yes it is

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 16, 2016

type bugfix

to make the bot add a label

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 16, 2016

On 9/16/16 8:28 AM, Felice Pantaleo wrote:

bugfix

#13028
the magic words should start with "type"


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#15862 (comment), or
mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEdcbuBWm2ZPl0lWx3JhghNvSzGHY80Yks5qqrWCgaJpZM4J-ArZ.

@felicepantaleo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @slava77 :-)

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Sep 23, 2016

+1

for #15862 3bdcae9

  • bugfix as described; also adds customiseForTripletsByCellularAutomaton applicable to reco/step3 checks/tests. The modified code is not a part of standard workflows.
  • jenkins tests pass
  • checked locally with 10224 in CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-09-19-1100: step3 with customiseForTripletsByCellularAutomaton added leads to a crash in the baseline on the second event, while the version with this PR runs to completion.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants