Add HGCAL L1 trigger in SimL1Emulator and event content

[jbsauvan]

For the phase2_hgcal era:

• Add the HGCAL L1 trigger simulation in the SimL1Emulator sequence
• Add the HGCAL trigger cell digis in the L1TriggerFEVTDEBUG event content

The processing time increase is a bit more than 1s/event for 200PU events. The output collection size is about 400kB/event for 200PU events.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @jbsauvan (Jean-Baptiste Sauvan) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

L1Trigger/Configuration

@cmsbuild, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[jbsauvan]

@lgray This is something you might want to follow

[lgray]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15337/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ba0c9d9
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15952/15337/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15952/15337/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• 10424.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017NewFPix_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017NewFPix+RecoFull_2017NewFPix+HARVESTFull_2017NewFPix

[jbsauvan]

@rekovic @mulhearn you already saw these changes in an email I sent you 2 weeks ago.
Could you take a look again and tell me if you have comments?
Thanks

[rekovic]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #15952 was updated. @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[jbsauvan]

Thanks! Rebase done.
@rekovic @mulhearn, could you have a look again after the changes? The direct imports of Eras have been removed.
And could someone trigger the tests?
Thanks

[jbsauvan]

@rekovic @mulhearn @davidlange6
Can this PR be signed / merged, or do you need that I make some changes?
Thanks

[rekovic]

+1

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15493/console

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: f68d998
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15952/15493/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-15952/15493/summary.html

[jbsauvan]

@davidlange6
Now that it is fully signed, do you think this PR can be merged? Or do you have comments?
Thanks

[davidlange6]

+1