L1T O2O: degubing of uGMT + new prototype for caloParams payload + scripts' development

[kkotov]

Few non-critical cosmetic changes to the L1T O2O utilities and scripts including:
0) #include

1. viewer for comparing the L1TMuonGlobalParams payloads (useful for debugging)
2. version of the prototyping caloParams, that O2O starts with and reloads with config from the online
3. fixes to the "trigger key validation" script and suppressing verbosity of the main runL1-O2O-iov.sh script

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @kkotov for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

CondTools/L1TriggerExt
L1TriggerConfig/L1TConfigProducers
L1TriggerConfig/Utilities

The following packages do not have a category, yet:

L1TriggerConfig/L1TConfigProducers
L1TriggerConfig/Utilities

@ggovi, @cmsbuild, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @apfeiffer1 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are list here #13028

[ggovi]

please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15523/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: 7c20dfc
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16033/15523/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16033/15523/summary.html

[smuzaffar]

Should we assign these new un-assigned packages to L1?

L1TriggerConfig/L1TConfigProducers
L1TriggerConfig/Utilities

[koskot77]

@smuzaffar yes, the two packages should be assigned to L1 as, if I'm not mistaking, was also done earlier to L1TriggerConfig/L1TUtmTriggerMenuProducers that is now moved into the L1TriggerConfig/L1TConfigProducers

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #16033 was updated. @ggovi, @rekovic, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[rekovic]

+1

[ggovi]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

@kkotov - as you might imagine, this PR needs a more appropriate title as well. Thanks

[kkotov]

@davidlange6 , done

[davidlange6]

+1