New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end. #1618
Conversation
…ng condition pre-loading
…e' into new-conddb Conflicts: CondCore/CondDB/interface/ORAWrapper.h CondCore/CondDB/src/ORAWrapper.cc
Conflicts: CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.cc CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.h CondCore/CondDB/test/testConditionDatabase_0.cpp
… the migration tools
A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi for CMSSW_7_0_X. Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end. It involves the following packages: CondCore/DBCommon @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. |
+1 |
Hi, |
Conflicts: CondCore/CondDB/src/Time.cc
Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again. |
+1 On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks, |
-1 >> Compiling /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/IOVProxy.cc >> Compiling /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/IOVSchema.cc >> Compiling /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/KeyList.cc In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.h:4:0, from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/GTEditor.cc:2: /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/poison/CondCore/CondDB/interface/Configuration.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. ^ In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.h:4:0, from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/GTProxy.cc:2: /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/poison/CondCore/CondDB/interface/Configuration.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. you can see the results of the tests here: |
Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again. |
+1 On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks, |
-1 Copying tmp/slc5_amd64_gcc481/src/CondCore/DBCommon/src/CondCoreDBCommon/libCondCoreDBCommon.so to productstore area: In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/PayloadRef.h:3, from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/Utilities/interface/CondIter.h:7, from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/Utilities/interface/CondCachedIter.h:5, from src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes.h:12: /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member 'm_owned' /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: making 'm_owned' static /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member 'm_owned' --->> genreflex: INFO: Parsing file src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes.h with GCC_XML --->> genreflex: ERROR: processing file with gccxml. genreflex command failed. --->> genreflex: WARNING: Class std::vectorcond::PayloadRef in selection file src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes_def.xml not generated. you can see the results of the tests here: |
Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again. |
+1 On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks, |
It's a bitter lesson to learn. I just had to close a pull request because if that. |
indeed. I only hope that with the new root-6 C++11 (and 14) will be fully On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones notifications@github.comwrote:
Thanks, |
The claim from Axel is that it will be able to parse but not persist it, Ciao, |
-1 ---> test testPayloadProxy had ERRORS you can see the results of the tests here: |
Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again. |
+1 |
+1 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:46 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:
Thanks, |
Does this mean that can I merge it? It is missing signatures from Alca. |
yes, please go ahead and merge it. The changes here are fully within the Thanks, |
Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end.
Update RecoMET/METPUSubtraction data to latest update.
Solved conflict in the merge (kept the first in time of the two crossing changes). In addition, the integration of the ORA based storage as an alternative back-end has been completed.