Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end. #1618

Merged
merged 21 commits into from Dec 4, 2013

Conversation

ggovi
Copy link
Contributor

@ggovi ggovi commented Nov 28, 2013

Solved conflict in the merge (kept the first in time of the two crossing changes). In addition, the integration of the ORA based storage as an alternative back-end has been completed.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ggovi for CMSSW_7_0_X.

Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end.

It involves the following packages:

CondCore/DBCommon
CondCore/CondDB
CondCore/TagCollection
CondCore/Utilities
CondCore/ORA

@apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@ktf you are the release manager for this.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1
pJa

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
This pull request is still not mergeable.

Conflicts:
	CondCore/CondDB/src/Time.cc
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1
merges now on top of CMSSW_7_0_X ...

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

Pull request #1618 #1618 was
updated. @apfeiffer1 https://github.com/apfeiffer1, @nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezo,
@demattia https://github.com/demattia, @cmsbuildhttps://github.com/cmsbuild,
@rcastello https://github.com/rcastello, @ggovihttps://github.com/ggovican you please check and sign again.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1618#issuecomment-29474019
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
I found an error when building:

>> Compiling  /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/IOVProxy.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/IOVSchema.cc 
>> Compiling  /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/KeyList.cc 
In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.h:4:0,
                 from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/GTEditor.cc:2:
/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/poison/CondCore/CondDB/interface/Configuration.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
 #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.
  ^
In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/SessionImpl.h:4:0,
                 from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/CondDB/src/GTProxy.cc:2:
/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/poison/CondCore/CondDB/interface/Configuration.h:1:2: error: #error THIS FILE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE.


you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1618/1527/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1
build error should be fixed with this, please test again ?

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 10:58 AM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

Pull request #1618 #1618 was
updated. @apfeiffer1 https://github.com/apfeiffer1, @nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezo,
@demattia https://github.com/demattia, @cmsbuildhttps://github.com/cmsbuild,
@rcastello https://github.com/rcastello, @ggovihttps://github.com/ggovican you please check and sign again.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1618#issuecomment-29506124
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
I found an error when building:

Copying tmp/slc5_amd64_gcc481/src/CondCore/DBCommon/src/CondCoreDBCommon/libCondCoreDBCommon.so to productstore area:
In file included from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/PayloadRef.h:3,
                 from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/Utilities/interface/CondIter.h:7,
                 from /build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/Utilities/interface/CondCachedIter.h:5,
                 from src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes.h:12:
/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization of member 'm_owned'
/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: making 'm_owned' static
/build/cmsbuild/jenkins-workarea/workspace/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE/slc5_amd64_gcc481/CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-11-29-0200/src/CondCore/DBCommon/interface/DbTransaction.h:41: error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member 'm_owned'
--->> genreflex: INFO: Parsing file src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes.h with GCC_XML 
--->> genreflex: ERROR: processing file with gccxml. genreflex command failed.
--->> genreflex: WARNING: Class std::vectorcond::PayloadRef in selection file src/CondTools/Utilities/test/classes_def.xml not generated.


you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1618/1531/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1
lesson learned: do not use C++11 features if someone somewhere is trying to
get your header file into a root-5 dictionary. :(((((

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:18 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

Pull request #1618 #1618 was
updated. @apfeiffer1 https://github.com/apfeiffer1, @nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezo,
@demattia https://github.com/demattia, @cmsbuildhttps://github.com/cmsbuild,
@rcastello https://github.com/rcastello, @ggovihttps://github.com/ggovican you please check and sign again.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1618#issuecomment-29510310
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

@Dr15Jones
Copy link
Contributor

It's a bitter lesson to learn. I just had to close a pull request because if that.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

indeed. I only hope that with the new root-6 C++11 (and 14) will be fully
supported.

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Chris Jones notifications@github.comwrote:

It's a bitter lesson to learn. I just had to close a pull request
because if that.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1618#issuecomment-29515811
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Nov 29, 2013

The claim from Axel is that it will be able to parse but not persist it,
at least for the first incarnation…

Ciao,
Giulio

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 2, 2013

-1
I ran the usual tests and I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testPayloadProxy had ERRORS
---> test testConditionDatabase_0 had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1618/1539/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 3, 2013

Pull request #1618 was updated. @apfeiffer1, @nclopezo, @demattia, @cmsbuild, @rcastello, @ggovi can you please check and sign again.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Dec 4, 2013

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

+1
ready to go. :)

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:46 PM, cmsbuild notifications@github.com wrote:

+1

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1618/1587/summary.html


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/1618#issuecomment-29805398
.

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

nclopezo commented Dec 4, 2013

Does this mean that can I merge it? It is missing signatures from Alca.

@apfeiffer1
Copy link
Contributor

yes, please go ahead and merge it. The changes here are fully within the
"DB subsection" of AlCaDB. :)

Thanks,
cheers, andreas

nclopezo added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2013
Superseding the previous request after conflicts clean up. Completed integration of existing ORA storage technology as a parallel back end.
@nclopezo nclopezo merged commit 9b260bc into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_X Dec 4, 2013
ggovi pushed a commit to ggovi/cmssw that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2017
Update RecoMET/METPUSubtraction data to latest update.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants