Navigation Menu

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Propagate the overthreshold / high charge bit to phase2 clusters #16200

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 23, 2016

Conversation

delaere
Copy link
Contributor

@delaere delaere commented Oct 13, 2016

Minimal change to propagate the over-threshold bit in digis from SSA chips to phase 2 tracker clusters.

This should have been done long ago and was somehow overlooked when the othr bit was added to digis. This is required for TDR studies of HSCP particles.

The cluster "high charge bit" is set as soon as one digi has that bit on. This corresponds to the expected behavior of the CIC chip.

Tested with runTheMatrix.py --what upgrade -l 21200 in the last nightly. The output contains 7% of clusters with the bit set.

@boudoul @atricomi @thomaslenzi

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @delaere (Christophe Delaere) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoLocalTracker/SiPhase2Clusterizer

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @gpetruc, @threus this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@delaere delaere changed the title Propagate the overthreshold / HIP bit to phase2 clusters Propagate the overthreshold / high charge bit to phase2 clusters Oct 13, 2016
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 13, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 13, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15715/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16200/15715/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

  • 10021.0_TenMuE_0_200+TenMuE_0_200_pythia8_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017
  • 10024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017+RecoFull_2017+ALCAFull_2017+HARVESTFull_2017
  • 10424.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017NewFPix_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017NewFPix+RecoFull_2017NewFPix+ALCAFull_2017NewFPix+HARVESTFull_2017NewFPix
  • 10624.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017HCALdev_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017HCALdev+RecoFull_2017HCALdev+ALCAFull_2017HCALdev+HARVESTFull_2017HCALdev
  • 10824.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2017AllNew_GenSimFull+DigiFull_2017AllNew+RecoFull_2017AllNew+ALCAFull_2017AllNew+HARVESTFull_2017AllNew

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16200 6221f82

Saving an over-threshold bit for Phase 2 clusters. There should be no change in monitored quantities.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-10-13-1100 show no significant differences, as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit af91ba3 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Oct 23, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants