Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2 OT Rings and Navigation fixed for tk geometry v4021 #16207

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Oct 25, 2016

Conversation

ebrondol
Copy link
Contributor

@ebrondol ebrondol commented Oct 13, 2016

This PR takes care of the number of rings in the new layout for the phase 2 tracker - the so-called V4021. Before, the number of rings in the OT was fixed to 15, now the size can change between rings. Moreover, this PR also fix the Navigation School in this layout: the logic in the forward layers ordering was not suitable anymore. A fast fix has been applied, but it can also be modify with something better when the reconstruction and the layout will be definitive.
The new navigation map can be found d4.pdf and it does appear as it should. In order to produce it by yourself, the following analyzer can be used: RecoTracker/TkNavigation/test/NavigationSchoolAnalyzer_cfg.py.

The others geometry should stay unchanged. In order to facilitate the comparison, I have already produced the MTV results with ttbar sample for run2, phase 1 and phase 2 - D1 geometry.

More fixes are needed in order to get the new phase2 geometry ready for performance, but with this PR it should be possible to create the entire D4 WF running (@boudoul). So, please consider this PR as urgent. Thanks.

@kpedro88 @makortel @atricomi @venturia

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @ebrondol for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoTracker/TkDetLayers
RecoTracker/TkNavigation

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @makortel, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @mschrode, @gpetruc, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 13, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15716/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16207 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@ebrondol
Copy link
Contributor Author

ebrondol commented Oct 19, 2016

With this last commit, I update the pixel cluster shape filter to be off for phase2 as discussed.
I have produced privately the results for extended muons for D1 and D4. For D1, we see better efficiency (especially at low pt) and increment in fakes is not as important, instead for D4 the eff in the barrel region is completely restored. In summary, very good news.

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 19, 2016

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16207 was updated. @cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@ebrondol
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 @slava77
please let me know if these fixes can be considered acceptable.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

please test
(looks good to me)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 24, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15925/console

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16207 808099a

Second approval, after very small code fix. The code revision is satisfactory, and the new Jenkins tests show the same expected changes as before.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 7820946 into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Oct 25, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants