Implemented BoostedDoubleSVTagInfos (80X)

[ferencek]

80X backport of #16124

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @ferencek (Dinko Ferencek) for CMSSW_8_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

DataFormats/BTauReco
DataFormats/PatCandidates
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoBTag/SecondaryVertex
RecoBTau/JetTagComputer

@cmsbuild, @cvuosalo, @slava77, @monttj, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@TaiSakuma, @gouskos, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @imarches, @ahinzmann, @acaudron, @mmarionncern, @rappoccio, @jdolen, @nhanvtran, @gpetruc, @gkasieczka, @schoef, @ferencek, @mverzett, @mariadalfonso, @pvmulder, @cbernet this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

[slava77]

@ferencek
just to be clear, are there any changes to any of the saved products in AOD, RECO, or miniAOD from this PR?
Please clarify.

[ferencek]

There are no changes to stored products. However, note that the pat::Jet interface has a new accessor function for newly added TagInfos but there are no changes to the class data members.

[slava77]

@cmsbuild please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15765/console

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: ed96160
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16224/15765/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16224/15765/summary.html

[cvuosalo]

backport #16124

[cvuosalo]

+1

For #16224 ed96160

Adding a new, more flexible TagInfo format for the BoostedDoubleSV tagger. There should be no change in monitored quantities.

#16124 is the 81X version of this PR, and it has already been merged.

The code changes are satisfactory and match those in #16124. Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_0_X_2016-10-16-0000 show no significant differences, as expected.

[monttj]

+1
backport #16124

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[davidlange6]

+1