Run2-sim04 Update Geant4 production Physics List for HGCal

[bsunanda]

Use the same EMM Geant4 Physics List configuration for the HGCal region as for the Hcal region".

[bsunanda]

@cmsbuild Please test

[cmsbuild]

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/15807/console

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

SimG4Core/PhysicsLists

@cmsbuild, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: df6ac5a
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16258/15807/summary.html
Additional comment: 'materialbudget'

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16258/15807/summary.html

@slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:

• 20024.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D1_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D1+RecoFullGlobal_2023D1+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D1
• 22424.0_TTbar_13+TTbar_13TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D3Timing_GenSimHLBeamSpotFull+DigiFull_2023D3Timing+RecoFullGlobal_2023D3Timing+HARVESTFullGlobal_2023D3Timing

[bsunanda]

@civanch HGCal being a sampling calorimeter may be treated in the same way as Hcal. I just tried to do his here. Could you approve this so that FTFP_BERT_EMM can be used for all HGCal applications.

[civanch]

@bsunanda , I will approve but , please, change the title which is completely misleading.

You need to write a short description something like:
Title: "Update Geant4 production Physics List for HGCal"
Description: "Use the same EMM Geant4 Physics List configuration for the HGCal region as for the Hcal region".

[bsunanda]

@civanch I did the changes you asked

[civanch]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar