Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix MultiTrackValidator MVA monitoring (81X) #16661

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 24, 2016

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented Nov 16, 2016

Backport of #16660 (submitting to 81X to fix workflows being run in IB):

This PR fixes a bug introduced in #16559. The logic inferring the track MVA selector names missed a check that the MVA selector is part of the iteration sequence. This omission lead errors for tracking eras without MVA selection (trackingLowPU, trackingPhase1PU70, trackingPhase2PU140) in trackingOnly workflows. The check is added here.

Tested in CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-11-15-2300, no changes expected in non-trackingOnly workflows, or in trackingOnly workflows with run2 or trackingPhase1 tracking.

@rovere @VinInn

Otherwise MVA selectors enter e.g. for trackingPhase1PU70 resulting in
a "missing product" error.
@cmsbuild cmsbuild added this to the Next CMSSW_8_1_X milestone Nov 16, 2016
@makortel makortel changed the title Fix MultiTrackValidator MVA monitoring Fix MultiTrackValidator MVA monitoring (81X) Nov 16, 2016
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for CMSSW_8_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

RecoTracker/IterativeTracking
Validation/RecoTrack

@cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @rovere, @VinInn, @mschrode, @wmtford, @gpetruc, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@slava77, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 16, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16386/console

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bugfix

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

backport of #16660

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16661/16386/summary.html

Alternative comparison was/were failed for workflow(s):
25202.0
1001.0

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #16661 was updated. @cvuosalo, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @slava77, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 22, 2016

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/16543/console

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

urgent

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-16661/16543/summary.html

Alternative comparison was/were failed for workflow(s):
9.0

@cvuosalo
Copy link
Contributor

+1

For #16661 18b2b56

Fix a bug in MVA selection for tracking-only workflows. There should be no change in monitored quantities for other workflows.

#16660 is the 90X version of this PR, and it has already been approved.

The code changes are satisfactory, and Jenkins tests against baseline CMSSW_8_1_X_2016-11-21-2300 show no significant differences, as expected. Expanded configs were checked for #16660, and they show that only tracking-only workflows are changed as expected.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_8_1_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @slava77, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit e40a23d into cms-sw:CMSSW_8_1_X Nov 24, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants