New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "Merge pull request #17175 from pietverwilligen/90X_NewME0GeometryBuilder_ForPR_v1" (only for L1 TDR production) [90X] #17911
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: Configuration/Geometry @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 920943f You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test2023Geometry had ERRORS |
Comparison job queued. |
Apparently the D11 detector was added after #17175 was merged, so reverting it did not fix that XML config. Good thing I added the unit test... |
@cmsbuild please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Pull request #17911 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
@davidlange6 is 90X still being merged into 91X? I would like to avoid a "revert revert" PR to 91X... |
we have never merged 90x into 91x
… On Mar 14, 2017, at 3:30 PM, Kevin Pedro ***@***.***> wrote:
@davidlange6 is 90X still being merged into 91X? I would like to avoid a "revert revert" PR to 91X...
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
+1 |
CMSSW_9_0_0
is planned to be used for the Phase2 L1Trigger TDR MC production. For expediency, we prefer to reuse existing GEN-SIM from the Phase2 Tracker TDR production, rerunning only the DIGI step. In order to have a compatible release, a change in the ME0 geometry (PR #17175) must be reverted. (The new improved ME0 geometry will be retained in CMSSW_9_1_X for further development and other future TDR productions.)attn: @rekovic, @calabria, @jshlee, @pietverwilligen, @davidlange6, @mdhildreth