Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Merge pull request #17175 from pietverwilligen/90X_NewME0GeometryBuilder_ForPR_v1" (only for L1 TDR production) [90X] #17911

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 15, 2017

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

CMSSW_9_0_0 is planned to be used for the Phase2 L1Trigger TDR MC production. For expediency, we prefer to reuse existing GEN-SIM from the Phase2 Tracker TDR production, rerunning only the DIGI step. In order to have a compatible release, a change in the ME0 geometry (PR #17175) must be reverted. (The new improved ME0 geometry will be retained in CMSSW_9_1_X for further development and other future TDR productions.)

attn: @rekovic, @calabria, @jshlee, @pietverwilligen, @davidlange6, @mdhildreth

…E0GeometryBuilder_ForPR_v1" (only for L1 TDR production)

This reverts commit 6071ff6, reversing
changes made to 66d4dd2.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for CMSSW_9_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Geometry
Geometry/CMSCommonData
Geometry/GEMGeometry
Geometry/GEMGeometryBuilder
Geometry/MuonCommonData
Geometry/MuonNumbering

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @ptcox, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here #13028

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 13, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18374/console Started: 2017/03/13 21:05

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 920943f

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17911/18374/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: UnitTests

  • Unit Tests:

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test2023Geometry had ERRORS

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

Apparently the D11 detector was added after #17175 was merged, so reverting it did not fix that XML config. Good thing I added the unit test...

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 13, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18379/console Started: 2017/03/13 23:28

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #17911 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @ianna, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@ianna
Copy link
Contributor

ianna commented Mar 14, 2017

+1

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

@davidlange6 is 90X still being merged into 91X? I would like to avoid a "revert revert" PR to 91X...

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

davidlange6 commented Mar 14, 2017 via email

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 329dfac into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_0_X Mar 15, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants