Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

L1T BlockHeader changes for L1T ZS DQM #17956

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 3, 2017

Conversation

thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

Added the ZS validation flag to the L1T BlockHeader to be used with the online DQM zero suppression module.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 16, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/L1TMonitor
EventFilter/L1TRawToDigi

@dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @kreczko this is something you requested to watch as well.
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Mar 16, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 16, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18499/console Started: 2017/03/16 17:52

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1

Tested at: 27c81bc

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-17956/18499/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
135.4 step3

runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step3_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

This segfault does not seem to have anything to do with the L1 code. Can we run the tests again please?

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Mar 17, 2017

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Mar 17, 2017

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 17, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/18511/console Started: 2017/03/17 10:45

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Mar 23, 2017

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

thomreis commented Apr 3, 2017

Hi @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar,
what is keeping this and #17958 from being merged?

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

If there is a problem with this PR please let me know so that I can fix it. If not please merge it so that it can be in the next release deployed for the DQM at p5.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar can someone please tell me what keeps this from being merged? It is fully signed for a month now.

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented Apr 25, 2017

@davidlange6
Please post your concerns. We should fix this for data taking. Thanks.

@rekovic
Copy link
Contributor

rekovic commented May 2, 2017

Hi @davidlange6.
We should get this PR and #17958 ready for data taking.
Can we please get your explicit comments, so that we can address them efficiently.

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

i finally connected with @rekovic on this PR _ we agreed that in a followup PR that Block would go into a DataFormats package so that the usual CMS structure of data formats, producers, analyzers could be adopted

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit fa1b3e1 into cms-sw:master May 3, 2017
@thomreis thomreis deleted the L1T_DQM_zs-monitoring-fix_91x branch July 12, 2017 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants