New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L1T BlockHeader changes for L1T ZS DQM #17956
L1T BlockHeader changes for L1T ZS DQM #17956
Conversation
…. This variable contains the MP7 zero suppression flag.
A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for master. It involves the following packages: DQM/L1TMonitor @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 27c81bc You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: RelVals
When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows: runTheMatrix-results/135.4_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS/step3_ZEE_13+ZEEFS_13+HARVESTUP15FS+MINIAODMCUP15FS.log |
Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped) |
This segfault does not seem to have anything to do with the L1 code. Can we run the tests again please? |
Log from failing jobs 135.4 does not seem to point to this PR: will try test again. |
please test |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
Comparison job queued. |
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Hi @Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar, |
If there is a problem with this PR please let me know so that I can fix it. If not please merge it so that it can be in the next release deployed for the DQM at p5. |
@Muzaffar, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar can someone please tell me what keeps this from being merged? It is fully signed for a month now. |
@davidlange6 |
Hi @davidlange6. |
i finally connected with @rekovic on this PR _ we agreed that in a followup PR that Block would go into a DataFormats package so that the usual CMS structure of data formats, producers, analyzers could be adopted |
+1 |
Added the ZS validation flag to the L1T BlockHeader to be used with the online DQM zero suppression module.