New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding Timing vs BX plots, and modifying thresholds for laser quality #18069
Adding Timing vs BX plots, and modifying thresholds for laser quality #18069
Conversation
…eviation from this expected value which triggers RED in the quality plot, and changed the binning range to more clearly see the full shape.
A new Pull Request was created by @tanmaymudholkar (Tanmay Mudholkar) for CMSSW_9_0_X. It involves the following packages: DQM/EcalMonitorClient @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here #13028 |
Hi @davidlange6 , @dmitrijus , I wonder if we need to start the procedure (automated testing etc.) to get this merged with 90X. Automated tests have already been run on the corresponding 91X version: #18067 , which now awaits ORP approval before merging. In addition, thanks to some quick work by core DQM, this PR has already been applied as a patch onto the production version at P5. |
Hi @tanmaymudholkar, wait for until 91x is merged. |
Pull request #18069 was updated. @cmsbuild, @dmitrijus, @vanbesien, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again. |
I recently added a commit here to improve code readability. Please see the conversation in the 91X PR: #18067 |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @smuzaffar |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Companion to Deployment PR#455: dmwm/deployment#455
PR to CMSSW master: #18067