New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[93X] Improvements to L1 Offline DQM - part 2 (issue #19592) #19796
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @kreczko (Luke Kreczko) for master. It involves the following packages: DQMOffline/L1Trigger @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
-1 Tested at: 65a24fc The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: You can see the results of the tests here: I found follow errors while testing this PR Failed tests: UnitTests
I found errors in the following unit tests: The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready Comparison Summary:
|
As far as I can see all unit tests succeded (searching for
If I understand from the name, this file should not exist (and the test segment is marked as success). What am I missing? |
The test failure is unrelated to this PR. I will look into it. |
@dmitrijus Did you have any time to look into this? |
please test |
Pull request #19796 was updated. @vazzolini, @kmaeshima, @dmitrijus, @cmsbuild, @rekovic, @vanbesien, @mulhearn can you please check and sign again. |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready @slava77 comparisons for the following workflows were not done due to missing matrix map:
Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR implements the improvements requested in issue #19592 by the L1T team.
@tapperad et all, please have a look