Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modifications to Timing vs BX plot for ECAL (P5 Production version) #20256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 12, 2017

Conversation

tanmaymudholkar
Copy link
Contributor

@tanmaymudholkar tanmaymudholkar commented Aug 24, 2017

Fill Timing vs BX plot with a much finer binning for offline DQM (where we have more statistics), to make it more useful for non-ECAL people. For online DQM we modify the current binning to make it more useful to ECAL experts.

Link to PR for CMSSW master: #20257

Link to corresponding P5 DQM GUI Deployment PR: dmwm/deployment#531

…re we have more statistics). For online DQM we modify the current binning to make it more useful to ECAL experts.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @tanmaymudholkar (Tanmay Mudholkar) for CMSSW_9_2_X.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/EcalMonitorTasks

@kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@argiro this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 5, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/22725/console Started: 2017/09/05 17:16

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 5, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_9_2_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_9_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 5, 2017

-1

Tested at: 21790d3

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
f538f01
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22725/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22725/git-merge-result

You can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22725/summary.html

I found follow errors while testing this PR

Failed tests: RelVals

  • RelVals:

When I ran the RelVals I found an error in the following worklfows:
136.788 step2

runTheMatrix-results/136.788_RunSinglePh2017B+RunSinglePh2017B+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimSinglePh_Prompt+HARVEST2017/step2_RunSinglePh2017B+RunSinglePh2017B+HLTDR2_2017+RECODR2_2017reHLT_skimSinglePh_Prompt+HARVEST2017.log

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
f538f01
You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22725/git-log-recent-commits
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22725/git-merge-result

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 5, 2017

Comparison not run due to runTheMatrix errors (RelVals and Igprof tests were also skipped)

@tanmaymudholkar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @dmitrijus , I'm a little surprised some checks failed -- the problem log is here

and this is the exception message:
Algorithm L1_HTT320er_QuadJet_70_55_40_40_er2p4, requested as seed by a HLT path, cannot be matched to a L1 algo name in any GlobalObjectMap
Please check if algorithm L1_HTT320er_QuadJet_70_55_40_40_er2p4 is present in the L1 menu

I'm not sure if there is a problem with the GT in the default runTheMatrix workflow, but in any case this PR only changes some local ECAL DQM code.

(This PR has actually been deployed successfully already at P5.)

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 6, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/22753/console Started: 2017/09/06 16:58

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 6, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 6, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 6, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20256/22753/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 23
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 1904540
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14901
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 1889465
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 174
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 94 log files, 14 edm output root files, 23 DQM output files

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 438c5cf into cms-sw:CMSSW_9_2_X Sep 12, 2017
@tanmaymudholkar tanmaymudholkar deleted the ModifyingBXBinning_929 branch September 12, 2017 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants