Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tuning of Strip QTest for higher PU/track-density #20717

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2017
Merged

tuning of Strip QTest for higher PU/track-density #20717

merged 1 commit into from Oct 3, 2017

Conversation

fioriNTU
Copy link
Contributor

@fioriNTU fioriNTU commented Oct 2, 2017

This PR tune the Strip QTest thresholds to cope with the higher PU in recent physics fills and with higher track density in view of the hi collisions

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2017

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2017

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-20717/1093

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 2, 2017

A new Pull Request was created by @fioriNTU for master.

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorClient

@kmaeshima, @cmsbuild, @vanbesien, @vazzolini, @dmitrijus can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@idebruyn, @threus, @hdelanno, @venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@dmitrijus
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/23395/console Started: 2017/10/03 15:11

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2017

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2017

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2017

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 3, 2017

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-20717/23395/summary.html

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 26
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2761357
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 257
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2760913
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 187
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • Checked 107 log files, 10 edm output root files, 26 DQM output files

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 6fd3e64 into cms-sw:master Oct 3, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants