Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use deterministic seed for time smearing producers #21354

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 25, 2017

Conversation

kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves #20621

The TrackTimeValueMapProducer now uses STL <random> with the PRNG reseeded for every event. The seed is based on the event run/lumi/event numbers and the chi2 value of the first track. (The last quantity is added to ensure different seeding when the producer is called with different collections. Currently two versions of it exist in the Phase2 reco sequences, one for general tracks and another for GSF electron tracks.)

I checked the t() value of the 4D vertices after running 20034.2 with step3 on 1 thread vs 4 threads. In the default release, I see a change; with this PR, there is no change.

Should this be backported to 93X? It runs in RECO, while with 93X we only plan to do re-miniAOD.

attn: @lgray, @bendavid

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

sigh, a conflict arose in the past ~hour. Rebasing...

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually, will wait for the next IB to rebase.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

assign upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21354/2049

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

New categories assigned: upgrade

@kpedro88 you have been requested to review this Pull request/Issue and eventually sign? Thanks

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @kpedro88 (Kevin Pedro) for master.

It involves the following packages:

IOMC/RandomEngine
SimTracker/TrackAssociation

@smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@abbiendi, @makortel, @sdevissc, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @jhgoh, @VinInn, @wddgit, @rovere, @ebrondol, @threus, @dgulhan this is something you requested to watch as well.
@davidlange6, @slava77 you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

Your PR is unmergeable. Please have a look and possibly rebase it.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/PR-21354/2061

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21354 was updated. @smuzaffar, @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88 can you please check and sign again.

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 18, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24518/console Started: 2017/11/18 06:38

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 22, 2017

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/ib-any-integration/24639/console Started: 2017/11/22 20:50

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #21354 was updated. @perrotta, @civanch, @mdhildreth, @cmsbuild, @kpedro88, @slava77 can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison job queued.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-21354/24639/summary.html

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
10824.0 step 5
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Comparison Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 14 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 27
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 2717769
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 172
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 2717421
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 176
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 1.14999999999 KiB( 23 files compared)
  • Checked 111 log files, 8 edm output root files, 27 DQM output files

@civanch
Copy link
Contributor

civanch commented Nov 23, 2017

+1

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

  • Usage of a different random engine modifies the Phase2 events with timing, as for wf 20434.0_TTbar_14TeV+TTbar_14TeV_TuneCUETP8M1_2023D19 in the jenkins tests
  • Differences are compatible with a modified random sequence
  • A few examples follow:
    image
    image

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@kpedro88
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

1 similar comment
@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 31ef92c into cms-sw:master Nov 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants