New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix edmProvDump handling of processing history #21469
Conversation
Recording the processing history was not always correct for edmProvDump. This did not affect the default print out from the program but did affect getting additional information. Previously, only the earliest process would get its additional information dumped if there was only one process history associated with the file.
The code-checks are being triggered in jenkins. |
+code-checks |
please test |
+1 |
The tests are being triggered in jenkins. |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs after it passes the integration tests. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @davidlange6, @slava77, @smuzaffar (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages: IOPool/Common @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic: |
Comparison job queued. |
Comparison is ready There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
Recording the processing history was not always correct for
edmProvDump. This did not affect the default print out from the
program but did affect getting additional information. Previously,
only the earliest process would get its additional information dumped
if there was only one process history associated with the file.